Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Nat Con 2014;12:170-3 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncon.2014.09.007
Policy Forums
Urban forests and the conservation of threatened plant species: the case of the Tijuca National Park, Brazil
Nina Pougya,, , Eline Martinsa, Marcio Verdia, Juliana Amaral de Oliveiraa, Daniel Maurenzaa, Rodrigo Amaroa, Gustavo Martinellia,b
a Centro Nacional de Conservação da Flora – CNCFlora, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
b Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Received 30 August 2014, Accepted 16 September 2014

Increased human pressure on the planet's resources has lead to extensive loss and degradation of natural habitats increasing overall species’ extinction risk. This has led to the consensus that protected areas are an essential strategy for maintaining biodiversity and the ecological services it provides (Chape et al., 2005; Gaston et al., 2008; Pimm et al., 2014). During the twentieth century, protected areas were created under several different categories of protection in almost all countries around the world (Phillips, 2004). Currently, the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) acknowledges the existence of more than 160,000 protected areas worldwide, covering more than 13% of the Earth's land surface (WDPA, 2012). Brazil holds an outstanding position with fourth largest network of protected areas in the world (Gurgel et al., 2009), encompassing 12.4% of the national land area (WDPA, 2012).

Protecting nature in wilderness regions is already recognized as an important way to preserve biodiversity. However, as a consequence of global urbanization, the value of nature within or surrounding cities is increasing and becoming a viable alternative to preserve and promote biodiversity in urban areas (Araújo, 2003; Alvey, 2006; Kowarik, 2011). Green spaces in urban areas can also provide ecosystem services that benefit cities, such as, climate regulation (Bowler et al., 2010; Oliveira et al., 2011), water balance (Bolund and Hunhammar, 1999; Gómez-Baggethun and Barton, 2013), carbon storage (Timilsina et al., 2014), and air filtration of pollutants (Escobedo and Nowak, 2009; Escobedo et al., 2010). As well as these ecological benefits, the presence of nature in cities can enrich human lives, such as having a sense of freedom, unity with nature and happiness, and also creating beauty, silence, tranquility, better physical health and social interaction and integration (Chiesura, 2004; Kabisch et al., 2015).

Beyond the importance of these benefits, urban green areas inside or around cities can also preserve threatened species (Kühn et al., 2004; Alvey, 2006; Wang et al., 2007). This is true especially for the largest urban forest in the world, the Tijuca National Park, in Brazil (Mittermeier et al., 2004). The Tijuca Forest was intensely devastated mainly because of sugarcane farms in the seventeenth century and coffee farms in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. As a direct cause of such degradation, there was a major crisis in water supply in the city of Rio de Janeiro (Fragelli et al., 2013). In 1861, given the lack of water in the city, the emperor Dom Pedro II demanded the reforestation of degraded areas and, together with the natural regeneration, many areas were recovered (ICMBio, 2014a). This forest became formally a protected area in 1961 and is entirely surrounded by the city of Rio de Janeiro, the second most populous city in Brazil. The park has 3953ha, covering 3.5% of the area in Rio de Janeiro (ICMBio, 2014b).

The Tijuca National Park has great national and international visibility, given that it holds some of the main attractions and tourist destinations in the city and in the country. The monument of Christ the Redeemer located in the Corcovado mountain is one of the seven wonders of the modern world according to the United Nations. The viewpoint “Vista Chinesa”, and the mountains “Pedra da Gávea”, and “Pedra Bonita” are icons of Rio de Janeiro and are also located in this national park. As a consequence, the Tijuca National Park receives about 2 million visitors per year (ICMBio, 2014c) and provides economic benefits for the city (Fragelli et al., 2013). Further, the park was one of the main drivers for the recognition of the city of Rio de Janeiro as a World Heritage Site by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - UNESCO, in the cultural landscape category.

The Tijuca National Park is home of 67 threatened plant species (two of them endemics) that occur in Brazil (Fig. 1), representing 16% of all threatened species in the state of Rio de Janeiro (Martinelli and Moraes, 2013). From these 67 species, seven are classified as Critically Endangered (CR), 40 are Endangered (EN), and 20 are Vulnerable (VU) (Martinelli and Moraes, 2013). These figures could be even higher, as only 20% of the Flora of the state of Rio de Janeiro's have been evaluated so far. Considering all threatened plant species found in the state of Rio de Janeiro, the Tijuca National Park protects 11 species that do not occur in any other protected area, and covers more than 50% of known occurrence records for another 11 species. Fig. 2 shows the number of species protected and their percentage of records found within the park.

Fig. 1.
(0.96MB).

(A) View from the Tijuca National Park, the largest urban forest in the world. Photo: Pablo Viany Prieto. (B) Occurrence records for 67 threatened plant species in the Tijuca National Park, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Fig. 2.
(0.06MB).

Number of threatened species by percentage of occurrence records found within the Tijuca National Park, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

In the state of Rio de Janeiro there are 57 protected areas with known occurrence of threatened plant species. Among these protected areas, five are National Parks protecting 44% (188 species) of threatened plant species of in Rio de Janeiro, which harbors 425 species. The Tijuca National Park is the one that holds the highest number of threatened plant species (67 species) in Rio de Janeiro, although it is the smallest National Park in Brazil (MMA, 2014). The Itatiaia National Park, the first National Park created in Brazil, has the second highest number of known threatened plant species in Rio de Janeiro (60 species), although it is more than three times larger than the Tijuca National Park. Though these results could be related to biased sampling efforts given that the Tijuca National Park allows for a quick access for botanists and researchers in general, other national parks in Rio de Janeiro also show a significant level of species records, but without showing that of species protection. In any case, even in face of differential sampling efforts, the park has a substantial contribution for the conservation of threatened plant species in Brazil.

Here we highlight the importance of the Tijuca National Park for the conservation of threatened plant species and the biodiversity in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Moreover, the park is an excellent opportunity to establish or reinforce people-nature relationship that will ultimately raise people's awareness on the importance of biodiversity. As in other urban forests, the Tijuca National Park faces threats, such as the presence of invasive species, impacts of recreational activities, infrastructure impact (roads cutting the park), illegal urban occupation, and internal fragmentation of remaining vegetation by networks of trails. To preserve this urban forest and its threatened Flora species it is important to study the ecological impacts of these threats and ensure the application of research-based management in the Tijuca National Park.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References
Alvey, 2006
A. Alvey
Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest
Urban For. Urban Green., 5 (2006), pp. 195-201
Araújo, 2003
M.B. Araújo
The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe
Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 12 (2003), pp. 5-12
Bolund and Hunhammar, 1999
P. Bolund,S. Hunhammar
Ecosystem services in urban areas
Ecol. Econ., 29 (1999), pp. 293-301
Bowler et al., 2010
D.E. Bowler
Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence
Landsc. Urban Plan., 97 (2010), pp. 147-155
Chape et al., 2005
S. Chape
Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., 360 (2005), pp. 443-455
Chiesura, 2004
A. Chiesura
The role of urban parks for the sustainable city
Landsc. Urban Plan., 68 (2004), pp. 129-138
Escobedo et al., 2010
F. Escobedo
Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities
Environ. Sci. Policy, 13 (2010), pp. 362-372
Escobedo and Nowak, 2009
F.J. Escobedo,D.J. Nowak
Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest
Landsc. Urban Plan., 90 (2009), pp. 102-110
Fragelli et al., 2013
C. Fragelli
O Parque Nacional da Tijuca: um ícone para a conservação da biodiversidade e para a imagem do Rio de Janeiro
Parques Nacionais do Rio de Janeiro: desafios para uma gestão social da biodiversidade,
Gaston et al., 2008
K.J. Gaston
The ecological performance of protected areas
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 39 (2008), pp. 93-113
Gómez-Baggethun and Barton, 2013
E. Gómez-Baggethun,D.N. Barton
Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning
Ecol. Econ., 86 (2013), pp. 235-245
Gurgel et al., 2009
H. Gurgel
Unidades de conservação e o falso dilema entre conservação e desenvolvimento
Bol. Reg. Urbano Ambient., 3 (2009), pp. 109-120
ICMBio, 2014a
ICMBio - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Parque Nacional da Tijuca
(2014)
ICMBio, 2014b
ICMBio - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Parque Nacional da Tijuca
(2014)
ICMBio, 2014c
ICMBio - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Os 10 Parques Nacionais mais visitados - 2010 a 2012
(2014)
Kabisch et al., 2015
N. Kabisch,S. Qureshi,D. Haase
Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces – a systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 50 (2015), pp. 25-34
Kowarik, 2011
I. Kowarik
Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation
Environ. Pollut., 159 (2011), pp. 1974-1983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022
Kühn et al., 2004
I. Kühn,R. Brandl,S. Klotz
The flora of German cities is naturally species rich
Evol. Ecol. Res., 6 (2004), pp. 749-764
Martinelli and Moraes, 2013
G. Martinelli,M.A. Moraes
Livro Vermelho da Flora do Brasil
1st ed., Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, (2013)pp. 1102
Mittermeier et al., 2004
Mittermeier
Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Ecoregions
CEMEX, (2004)
MMA, 2014
MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente
Ferramentas e softwares de Geoprocessamento
(2014)
Oliveira et al., 2011
S. Oliveira,H. Andrade,T. Vaz
The cooling effect of green spaces as a contribution to the mitigation of urban heat: a case study in Lisbon
Build. Environ., 46 (2011), pp. 2186-2194
Phillips, 2004
A. Phillips
The history of the international system of protected area management categories
Parks, 14 (2004), pp. 4-14
Pimm et al., 2014
S.L. Pimm
The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection
Science, 344 (2014), pp. 1246752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752
Timilsina et al., 2014
N. Timilsina
Analyzing the causal factors of carbon stores in a subtropical urban forest
Ecol. Complex., 20 (2014), pp. 23-32
Wang et al., 2007
G. Wang
Biodiversity conservation in a fast-growing metropolitan area in China: a case study of plant diversity in Beijing
Biodivers. Conserv., 16 (2007), pp. 4025-4038
WDPA, 2012
World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)
Statistics
UNEP/WCMC/IUCN/WCPA, (2012)
Corresponding author at: Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão, 915, Jardim Botânico, 22460-030 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. (Nina Pougy nina@cncflora.net)
Copyright © 2014. Associação Brasileira de Ciência Ecológica e Conservação